It can not comprise within the mere report of the opinions, nor in merely a report of this viewpoints of this philosophers we discuss. You must protect the claims you make. You need to provide reasons why you should believe them.
Which means you can not simply state:
My view is P. i really believe this because.
we realize that the after considerations. give an argument that is convincing P.
Descartes says that Q; but, the thought-experiment that is following show that Q isn’t real.
Descartes says that Q. we find this claim plausible, for the after reasons.
- Criticize that argument; or show that one arguments for the thesis are not any good
- Protect the argument or thesis against another person’s critique
- Offer reasons to think the thesis
- Offer counter-examples to the thesis
- Contrast the talents and weaknesses of two opposing views about the thesis
- Provide examples that assist explain the thesis, or that really help to really make the thesis more plausible
- Argue that one philosophers are devoted to the thesis by their other views, though they don’t turn out and explicitly endorse the thesis
- Discuss exactly exactly just what consequences the thesis might have, if it had been real
- Revise the thesis, into the light of some objection